Sunday, December 4, 2011

Writing Advice 24—Scrivener and Building a Better Book


When I began writing these posts I started by discussing the various tools of the trade, in particular word processors, one of those being Scrivener. My computer runs Windows 7 and back then I was using MS Word and was having trouble seeing the point in using any of the writing programs. I had heard great things about Scrivener, mostly from folks with Macs. I even know of one person who bought a Mac just to be able to use Scrivener. But last year around this time I tried the Windows beta and was not impressed. I tried several of the available writing programs—those applications supposedly designed for writers as opposed to general office use—and found them all to be just a lot of gadgets that were more fun to play with than a useful tool for writing a novel. In other words, they were great for people who wanted to pretend to be writers.  And I concluded that to actually write all you needed was any basic word processor like Word or Open Office as all the extra bells and whistles only served to distract from the task at hand.

Last month, at the start of November, Scrivener ended its Windows beta and put out their official release. As I was starting a new book back then, and as I was playing with the idea of conducting a non-official NaNoRiMa of my own and as I knew Scrivener had a word counter, I tried it again.

I was pleasantly impressed.

A lot of changes were made from the year before, and those aspects that had made the program unusable by me, (the most glaring being the inability to resize the text on the screen independent of the print size,) were fixed. That was good news, but was it worth it? Could it really make writing easier, better?

The thing about Scrivener is that it is open-ended, meaning that it is simply a tool like a hammer, not a process like a diet plan. You can use it anyway you like. So if you want to tap a nail in with the wooden end—that’s fine, whatever suits your style. The question was, would this tool accommodate my style?

I sat down to find out.

I took time to watch the tutorials, I read how others used it, and talked to fellow writers Everyone else cited things like the ability to write out-of-order and then shift scenes around, or to being able to construct plots using the “index card” aspect of the program. I don’t do those things.  I start at the beginning and write to the end, which is why Word has always worked just fine. They also spoke of how the program complies the draft at the end of the project. Again, since I write from start to finish there is no need for this—another unnecessary step. They also spoke of the lack of formatting options as if that was a good thing. In the end I was about to give up as it did not appear to suit me, but then I decided to just “play” with it and see what it could do. I spent a weekend exploring the possibilities and discovered, a bit to my surprise, it is a useful program.

Three very practical aspects of this program changed my mind.

1.Advance Chapter Breakdowns



The “Binder”—the panel that appears on the left side, which works like a document index—houses folders and document trees that form the basic construction of the draft. In other words, there is a “Draft” folder, and inside that you can create folders and inside those you can create documents, in any combination you like, just as you do in your Documents Folder on your computer. The first hurdle I faced was how should I best organize my book in this program?

Friends all spoke about just writing scenes and organizing later. To me that’s just crazy talk, like saying, “just start building the house, and we’ll draw up the architectural designs  later.” Instead, I very methodically began by making a folder represent a chapter, and each document inside it a scene that would be divided by scene breaks. Scrivener is actually designed to handle this nicely. I wouldn’t say “intended” as like I said the program is open enough that you can do what you like. Instead of entitling the folders Chapter 1, Chapter 2 etc. I named them like I would for the finish book. “The Battle of Gateway Bridge,” “The Ghost of High Tower,” and so on. This let me know approximately what I was going to cover in that chapter, and should I wish to change the order of the chapters I could just drag and drop in the binder tree without having to then change the numbers.

Inside the folders I created files and entitled them with short descriptions of what I planned to cover in that section. “Opening fight”, “Hiding in the Barn.” This kind of “setup” work that I was forced to do before even starting to write annoyed me a bit until I realized that in laying out the structure for the program, what I was actually doing, was outlining my book.

This idea of an interactive, practical outline was the first really—oh! moment. This intrigued me.  Instead of writing out a bulleted list of events as an outline, I was making containers that did the same thing. Only I would later be able to use these folders and documents to make the book.

2. Notes



As you can see in the screen shots, on the right side is a "notes" column consisting of an index card at the top and below that a general notes window. At first I ignored these, but as I worked I saw this as a good way to replace scribbling things on pieces of paper that got lost. Soon however I realized that putting notes in each of the sections commenting what that section was about added to the idea of this interactive outline.

As I went through making my folders and section documents inside them, I put in short sentences in each section’s index cards mentioning the important points I needed to address in that section. And in the notes windows more elaborate thoughts I wanted to remember for that scene. This completed the outline just as I would have done if I were typing out a bulleted, or paragraphed list of events.

After finishing the folder-tree for the binder, I could then go back to the first document and begin writing the book. Opening that document I saw the notes I made of what I needed to write. When I finished that, I opened the next and there were the notes needed to remind me what to write there.

So instead of writing out an outline and constantly referring to it, the outline was in the book itself. I lost no time and this streamlined the writing process. I liked that.

3. Research



In addition to the “Draft” folder there is a “Research” folder. This is where Scrivener expects you to put all the info you found in preparing for your novel. Fact is I don’t do a lot of research for my fantasy books. I make all of it up. Still I felt bad looking at the Research folder thinking I should have something in there. Because it was the weekend, and because I was actively, and knowingly wasting time playing with the program, I started looking for stuff to put there.

I do have some lists that I’ve used. I have lists of names that I’ve created. Lists of medieval occupations, that sort of thing, and dropping them in here saved lots of time in finding them. I put the world map in, and made a couple of new ones for specific areas. My wife, suggested that I drop the Riyria novels in there too, so I could easily check them for references. That was just genius.

But it wasn’t enough. I found I started creating family-trees, and coats of arms. I created character timelines—their lives from birth to death, crossed indexed in an excel spread sheet against major story events, and added this to the eight thousand year history of the world I already had. I listed ranks of nobility and their appropriate address, and clan histories.



It still wasn’t enough. Then I realized what I really needed to put here were character sheets and setting descriptions. This would be a huge waste of time. I never did them before, but heh, I was supposed to be wasting time, so why not? I even went so far as to drag and drop photos from the web into the character sheets as reference. And on each page I started with the basics: when and where were they born, who were their parents, what was their childhood like…as I did this a funny thing happened. I started getting story ideas. I found that as I created these character outlines, I was going back and forth to my newly minted story outline and dropping notes into the note panels adding more things I wanted to bring up. New plot twists and new directions revealed themselves.

Wow! This really helps.

I took a whole week doing nothing more than “research” (making stuff up.) By the time I got done sketching in the major players in the story and a few of the major settings, I had the whole book laid out in fairly good detail, with lots of rich background that I could draw on. 



Over the next few weeks I began writing the novel.  The process was a breeze not only because I had everything right there, easy to find and easy to access, but also because so much of the work was already done. I didn’t have to stop mid-stream and think up a name for a new character. I already did that, in fact I had a whole history of the guy which I could use if I wanted, or just have as a basis for establishing his personality in my own mind. Less questions popped up as I wrote, and as a result the writing flowed with fewer roadblocks.

I was pleased enough that I will continue to use Scrivener, but more importantly, Scrivener managed to help improve my writing by showing how creating some character outlines and setting descriptions can provide fertile beds for adding in plot building and in smoothing out the writing process.

Writing a book can seem such a huge task that the initial reaction is to just start writing, as everything else feels like a waste of time, but some preparation up front can speed the process down the line and more than make up for the initial time investment. 

Scrivener is $40 and they have a 30 day free trial. It is available for both Mac and Windows, although the Mac version is more advanced and has more features as it has been out longer. 

And no, they aren't paying me for this.

19 comments:

  1. That was a very interesting look into your (new) writing process. Any chance some of those histories could ever make it into the back of the book in some way?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That was really useful, thank you. I've never really thought of using a writing programme before, but I might stay a little more organised with one like this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Scrivener is awesome. I can't imagine going back to a simple word processor these days (except when I'm on my iPad). The only real issue I've run into is when my book was ready to go to the editor. Editors these days all still use Word for everything, and Scrivener really lacks the "track changes" abilities that editors love Word for.

    Scrivener can easily export to a Word doc, that's not the issue, but once it's in the editor's hands, and they make changes, it's not easy to get back to Scrivener. I've read many readers who simply go from Scrivener to Word for the editor and then just stay in Word for the rest of the process. I can't stand Word, so this was not acceptable for me.

    I know you're just getting started with Scrivener, but how do you see this issue working itself out? Do you even submit an actual Word doc for edits? Maybe not with your Ridan-published works, but I can definitely see it going forward with a traditional publisher.

    You probably don't have the dislike of Word that I do, but I've grown to really love Scrivener, so jumping to Word for the last 40% of the writing process just sucks. For my needs, I just wrote some code to strip everything out of Word and import it properly back into Scrivener for me, but most people aren't programmers who can just whip that up on a whim. 0-]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps you might want to ask your editor to markup a physical copy of your manuscript? Then upon its return you could leaf through it and make the necessary changes via Scrivener?

      Delete
    2. Actually, my publisher did ask me if I wanted a hard copy of the manuscript edits which I found amazing in this age of digital communication. I asked about this, and found many authors still went through corrections on hard copy.

      That said...I don't have an issue with Word. I feel Word is still the premier word processor on the market. Scrivener is only a word processor set in a a writer friendly shell. Initially I was concerned that Scrivener's word processing would not be up to the task of replacing Word. As it happens it does pretty good, but I can't say it is better in that respect.

      Scrivener merely strips out most of the unnecessary components for an author and adds nice features that authors find useful for creating books. When it comes to edits, the extra features of Scrivener aren't important because I'm not creating a book where I need note and chapter shifting features. When it comes to editing, all I need are the editing features that Word excels at.

      So once the creation process is finished I no longer need the Scrivener features and Word works just fine.

      Delete
  4. Most of the stuff like note-cards, scenes and outlining I do on paper. I don't think I will be changing my process for my current trilogy, but there seems to be some really nice tools here to organize and outline. From what I can see and what you have told us, it might be the most excellent tool for series or episodic writing.

    Character sheets, building, multiple story arcs vs single story arcs etc.

    My Blog

    ReplyDelete
  5. Damon,

    I sent the manuscripts for all my books to Orbit in Word files, but when they were ready to send back their edits, that asked if I was willing to edit electronically.

    Initially I didn't know what they meant. Electronic edits? What was that? They explained that meant markups in a Word file.

    Oh. Well geez, I thought, how else would you do it, and they replied that they would send a hard printed copy for me to make written comments on.

    Really? I couldn't image doing that, but some authors do.

    No I don't have your aversion for Word. I've used it for almost thirty years. My first copy was Word for DOS (that was a nightmare.) I still use Word for many things, this blog for example. I only use Scrivener for novel writing because that's what that program is designed for. For all else I prefer the greater control over the formatting that Windows offers. And obviously I do my publisher edits in Word.

    ReplyDelete
  6. My tech friend is always telling me that the less hidden programming the better when the novel is placed into the InDesign file to prepare for upload to Lightning Source.

    He actually tells me that I should compose on Notepad, but so far I've found that to have its challenges, too.

    Do you have any idea how "clean" your copy will be when it is moved to InDesign? Does the program have some commentary on that aspect?

    http://www.tomkeplerswritingblog.com/p/stone-dragon.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love Scrivener and use it as well. What do you use to make those wonderful maps?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tom,
    You don't need to "clean" your formatting when moving text into InDesign. Most elements in Word, for example, import beautifully into InDesign (footnotes especially) and actually save time so long as you save back to a 2003/97 file format. I have a novel template I created in InDesign where I just delete the imported styles, and replace them with my pre-created InDesign files and within literally seconds 90% of the layout work is finished. I can usually layout a novel in about two hours depending on the number of chapters (not pages.) So I'm not sure what the problem is. Although granted, occasionally, you get a weird bug that might perplex you, but anyone who tells you to write an entire novel in Notepad so they can save a few minutes laying out a novel in InDesign is...this is friend of your huh?

    C.L.,
    I use Photoshop. I find existing map images, ones with little text and then using the cloning tool, the paint brush, and cut-and-paste, I rebuild them into completely different maps. The big green map started out as a topographical map of Ireland and a few other images.

    Thanks for posting both of you. I love questions.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I researched writing software, I went about it in a semi-methodical way. I took about 2 hours each day, over the course of 3-4 days, to research various available products. During that time I found some amazing tools/programs exist out there!
    I had recently switched from PC to MAC (LOVE) and went with Scrivener for a few reasons...
    1) The incredibly low price for what you get; 2) The excellent training videos by David and Keith, and 3) ORGANIZATION with a great interface. Previous to Scrivener, my writing was a behemoth in tons of Word files and folders; though organized, the framework of Scrivener blows away the method I was (trying) to use! I've made huge strides in my writing. GREAT PRODUCT! Now avail for PC!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I just got Scrivener myself. Imported my current novel in progress into it. Added my outline using the notecards. I tell you what, I'm loving it so far. Since I am very scene oriented, it integrates well with my thought process. Each scene in its own little container, easy to edit and reference on the fly. Working great so far.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great write up. I can agree with most of the comments here. Scrivener is an amazing tool. I initially started using Scrivener beta for the corkboard feature to help with outlining. I transitioned to using it for all of my writing just before NaNoWriMo 2011 and have not looked back. I love the intuitive interface and ability to use it how you want.

    If anyone is thinking of using it for either Windows or Mac take advantage of the free trial. If you decide you like it I still have a limited use coupon for 20% off on my website (smworth.blogspot.com). Should be able to click my name here, you'll find it. If you have any questions about the program or using the discount shoot me a message.

    Enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Even after reading how you found Scrivener useful, I don't really see anything I can't do with Office just as easily. Word's outlining tools are basically the same thing as the folder hierarchies. You want a separate place to record research and organize ideas? OneNote is basically made for that. Excel is nice for organizing some kinds of things too. I guess Scrivener might be a good alternative if you have $40 but not $99.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've not found a way to add notes to a Word doc. It might seems trivial, but this is one of the most useful features. Nor does Word promote me to outline the novel in advance. Nor does it allow me to house all the information needed for a project in one easy to find place.

      I still think Word is a superior word processor, but Scrivener is a better tool for authoring novels.

      Delete
  13. Just want to say that, as someone who deals with self-publishing quite a bit, Scrivener is a godsend because you can export to a number of different ready-to-upload formats. That and the command line Kindlegen program makes it all very easy.

    I use the Linux version, which is still in beta, but I've tried more developed programs and nothing really compares. I know InDesign backwards, but it's not really conducive to actually writing, so I would say that Scrivener should be the tool of choice for authors who want a great all-in-one writing and formatting program.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you for this post. I am currently using Scrivener for the first time, also for a fantasy novel, so your suggestions on using the program to enhance worldbuilding are inspirational.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you for this post!! I came across it in a google search for blogs about Scrivener. I am a writer and have just purchased a Mac and Scrivener. I was quite intimidated by all the bells and whistles, but after reasing this, plan on taking a week to just play with it to learn the ins and outs. Your suggestions have been a great help to me.

    ReplyDelete
  16. FOR THE BOOK WRITING H.S COURSE,THE WOULD-BE INTERNAL EXAMINER MUST WRITE 4 BOOKS IN HIS/HER SPECIALIZED SUBJECT IMMEDIATELY AFTER UPLOAD ALL THE PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN BOOKS,WHERE THE 2 BOOKS WRITTEN ON 2 SCIENCE SUBJECTS SHALL BE UPLOADED IN HIS/HER CO-WRITER'S ACCOUNT IN THE RESONANCE JOURNAL AND THAT HAS BEEN PRESCRIBED BY www.cbse.nic.in

    ReplyDelete