Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Fan Art
I was asked on the Riyria Facebook page if there was any fan art for the series. I only knew of the one, but then I looked and found three. The color one was done by my daughter, not sure if that is technically still fan art, I suppose it is, and I like it so I'm calling it fair. Notice how it is in the shape of a sword that is broken. Clever girl. (To see more of my daughter's art.)
Jesse Bechtold did these other two. One of which I already posted, but am reposting here because I can. (To see more of Jesse's work.)
Thanks to both for illuminating my world.
Monday, May 21, 2012
What He Said
On the one hand I am pleased to discover that so many of my views and experiences as an author are mirrored by such an accomplished writer as Mr. Gaiman, as it makes me think I'm doing something right. On the other hand I have no idea what I will say now if I am ever asked to give a commencement speech. I might be reduced to the he-took-my-answer defense. And of course, he did it much better than I ever could.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Names
Tyler Willis, a blogger since April 2012, whose profile
image looks remarkably like a profile placeholder writes…
Dear Michael,
Some author's have commented about agonizing for days or weeks over their book titles, others about the names of individual characters in the plot in terms of wanting them to sound authentic. Your views on these may be enlightening for a future comment, do you subscribe to any a set formula.
Some author's have commented about agonizing for days or weeks over their book titles, others about the names of individual characters in the plot in terms of wanting them to sound authentic. Your views on these may be enlightening for a future comment, do you subscribe to any a set formula.
First off, thanks for asking Tyler. It’s not always easy to
come up with topics, and questions help.
Second…I don’t agonize.
Someone once pointed out that Rowlings did a lot of nifty
things with her character names. Hogwarts teachers often reflected what they
taught. Malfoy, using the prefix “mal” to indicate evil as in malevolent. Clearly some authors like to
put jokes or clues into character names.
If you read my books to completion you will see that I did
this too, but only in the case of the Big Bad revealed at the end. The rest of
the characters were named in a far less grandiose process. What process you
ask?
I collect names.
Much like a butterfly hunter, or perhaps more accurately, a
bird watcher—whenever I spot a name I like, I pin it into a list I keep. Street
signs are a great source of fun names. There are three streets near me called,
Niblick, Mashie, and Follin. I just couldn’t resist thinking how these just
sound like goblin names. Turns out they are golf terms—old names for clubs, I
believe.
I also own a very old encyclopedia of proper names, which
long ago I went through A-Z looking for any names I didn’t recognize that I
thought were cool. This is how I came across Dahlgren, and Persepolis, which I
changed to Percepliquis, because I thought it sounded better. I did this
decades ago and forgot about it. Now when I see a name of something from my
series in the real world I think—wow, someone named a city after my novels! At
this point I’ve lost track what words I made up, which I modified and which I
stole, but I keep a list—three lists actually, and they are: Male Names, Female
Names, Names of Places and Things. This is where I dump all my gathered words.
Then as I am writing and a character is spontaneously made, as sometimes
happens, I just run down the list until I find a name that suits the character.
How do I do that?
Ah, now this is a trickier question, and likely more to the
point of the inquiry. How do you name your dog, your cat, your parakeet? Most
people look at the pet. A black lab almost always is called Blackie or Shadow. One with a white tip on its tail might be Tippy. It should
be noted that almost all pet names must end in “y” or “ie” or have a derivative
form that does. I don’t know why, it’s just a law of pet ownership. The point
is you can look at an animal and come up with a name based on how they appear
or act. A dog saved from a shelter is often called Lucky.
Characters can be handled the same way. You know what they
are like and pick an appropriate title, but what about children? How do parents
pick names for an expected delivery. Most choose prior to the birth and if they
used the same method there would be a whole lot of Kickies, and Oppsies,
walking around. In this process the name comes first, the character later. Some
just pick a name they think is pretty, some because they want their child to be
unique, or if traditional— after someone they know or knew—and others (the kind
ones) pick based off the I-don’t-want-them-to-be-beaten-up-in-school rule. Some
I think pick names in the hope the child will grow into it thinking that it
might help shape them. These are the ones who insist their son is called
Charles, not Charlie (or god forbid Chuck!) or more obviously, Richard rather
than Dick. (How Dick is derived from Richard is still a mystery, maybe the
original Richard was a real tool.)
The same is often true when creating a fictional character.
Sometimes you name them and from that name comes their character. Someone named
Royce isn’t a barbarian, and Hadrian isn’t a librarian. Now Myron—okay, raise
your hand if you know why I named him that? Yes—of course. I was looking for a
mousy sounding name, a name that the moment you read it, an idea might begin to
form. Myron sounds small, and meek. Myron could be mean, bitter and vindictive
as well, but generally I don’t ever get the impression of a Myron being
pompous. Royce sounds elegant, cool, slick, classy, impressive, mostly because
of the car. Hadrian was a Roman Caesar who lent his name to a famous wall built
to defend England from Scotland. When you think of Hadrian Blackwater’s
character you can see the similarities.
Oh yeah, that reminds me. Blackwater has nothing to do with
the real life mercenary organization. I created the name long before the Iraq
War. But it is interesting how real life can sometimes imitate art.
I picked the names of the Essendons with a concept in mind.
Arista, Amrath, Ann, Alric…can you guess the pattern? The same pattern exists
with the Woods—Theron, Thrace, Thad. I was creating family units using the
first letters. This, as it turned out wasn’t such a great idea as readers
sometimes had trouble telling one from the other.
Most frequently however I will be typing along and come to a
point where I need to name someone. If that person isn’t significant to the
story, I look up at the blank wall, think a second, then look at the keyboard. Which letter should it start with? Ever
notice how letters have personalities? S is powerful, cool and often sinister:
sorcerer, Sauron, Snape. B is not so bright, simple but friendly: Biff, Billy,
Baggins. G I often associate with harsh guttural ideas like goblins (Gandalf
being an exception.) So often a name begins as simply as me looking down at the
keyboard and matching a letter to the character, then I might just type
something and read it to myself and see how it sounds. Then I will modify it to
make it easier to pronounce. Iirabith looks sorta cool, but also feels like a
mouthful so I might trim it down to Iribith. Better, but still an eye-stopper
if you’re reading along. That’s one I’ll
have to sound out or skip. So, then I might change it into something more
recognizable like Ibith and from that to Ibis. Anyone ought to be able to
pronounce Ibis. And since the first name is odd, I’ll make the last name easy
and just use a real word—Thinly. Why Thinly? It just popped into my head and I
like the way Ibis Thinly sounds.
As you might be able to tell, I don’t waste much time on
names.
When I was first writing the series back around 2002—when I
had never published anything before, and assumed quite logically, I never
would—I remember coming to a name problem, like what should I call the big city
in Avryn? I would pause and consider that I should put some time into this.
Then I would think, why? No one is ever going to read it so who the heck cares?
Why spend hours picking just the right name when it doesn’t matter in the
slightest. This was a very strong case for not belaboring the point, but then,
a very tiny—Myronish—voice would squeak, “But what if it sells? What if this
becomes famous? What if this series becomes huge and a generation later the
original six volumes are considered the canon that conventioneer fanatics quote
to one another like The Princess Bride
or Star Trek?” This got me nervous
and thinking what if every word I write, every name is studied by literary
professors someday who extrapolate deep meanings based on the choices I make
now?
Colnora is very
telling of Mr. Sullivan’s subtle underscoring of his universe. Col being a root
term used in ancient Greek being a reference to Sol or the sun. This shows that
the city is the center of the commercial or trading universe in the world of
Elan. While Nora was the first name of an extremely prolific and successful
writer of fiction at the same time Sullivan wrote his books. So clearly
Sullivan is telling us that the city of Colnora is really a metaphor for
Jesus.
This is my nightmare.
I don’t put a lot of thought into the names. I picked them
because they look and sound like the name such a person should have. Mauvin and
Fanen were plucked out of thin air when I wrote the scene at Drondil Fields in The Crown Conspiracy. At the time I had
no idea those two would appear in any future books. I most certainly would have
picked better names if I knew. I mean Mauvin? The guy is the closest thing I
have to Tom Cruise in the series and I called him Mauvin?
Royce and Hadrian were, of course, carefully picked. They
took shape long before I sat down to write the series—a full decade before to
be exact. Those were two names I kept highlighted at the top of my list along
with Arcadius, Esrahaddon, Avryn, Wyatt, Elden, Arista, Miranda, and others,
some I haven’t used yet.
So to answer your question. I don’t agonize, and my names
are not “authentic” (if you mean this in some sort of Earth historical,
regional, or cultural manner, as any relation to Earth’s past is completely
coincidental.) Rather I try and make them appropriate as a means of helping to
define the character. There are some very minor exceptions. Most names of
Calian origin like DeWitt and DeLancy have a “De” in front of them. I took this
idea from McDonald and McMurphy, O’Brien and O’Sullivan as a way to designate
an ethnicity. And of course there is a specific reason that Avryn, Galewyr,
Gilarabrywn, and other such names are the way they are as well. If you finished
the series you already know.
I did have one early beta reader complain that using the
names Deminthal and DeWitt for the same person was inappropriate because one
was of Scottish origin and the other of Baltic, or some such thing, and how
could that possibly be—clearly I was ignorant or just lazy. Actually I was
both. Yet since neither Scotland nor the Baltic, or Europe for that matter, are
in my world, and because I really didn’t think too many readers knew the
etymology of these words and their suspect conflict, I felt it was okay to
ignore this.
As for title names, well that is a lot more complicated.
Chapter titles I pick mostly after I write them, unless I have a clear idea
going in. Book titles are important and those I will work on longer as a book
title isn’t just a reflection of the contents, it’s a marketing tool.
The original title of The
Crown Conspiracy was Heirs to the
Throne. Everyone thought Heirs was awful—me included, but I thought it was
accurate and didn’t give anything away. It was bad because it wasn’t sexy and
there are so many Heirs and Throne based titles out already. The Crown Conspiracy was more
intriguing, more exciting and oddly enough was, and still may be, unique as a
title. Nyphron Rising was originally
entitled Legends and Lore, which I
loved. My wife didn’t. She complained that Legends
and Lore Googled terribly. I needed something less popular. Rising is also
popular, but throwing Nyphron in front made it unique, and it still described
the contents.
When Orbit came to me with the idea of turning the six books
into three, I became concerned as to what the three books might be called. I
didn’t want two titles on each, and I didn’t want them naming the books. So
prior to agreeing to the deal I came up with three titles and got them to
agree. To do that I put on my authors and marketing hats. I wanted titles that
described the books and worked well together to brand the series.
The first two books of the series had one common feature,
both deal with the stealing of swords. I feel titles need to be very short so I
came up with Theft of Swords. I then
realized that to meet my series brand requirement, all the books must have the
same pattern of Blank of Blank. For book two I saw the primary feature of those
stories concerned the establishing of the new empire and so Rise of Empire fit very well. The last I
struggled with. Wintertide and Percepliquis are so very different. Then
it hit me and I felt stupid. The title was littered throughout the books,
repeated constantly—Heir of Novron.
Three short names, equal in pattern, but reflecting the theme of both books
contained within.
And there you have it Tyler. I hope this was helpful—a name
by any other rose is a horse of another color.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Better Early Than Late
The audiobook of Rise
of Empire was expected to be released in June, but I am happy to announce
the second volume of the six book trilogy is already available from Audible.com,
(which can also be purchased via an Audible button on Amazon.)
As you can see below, the audio version of Rise is listed as
number two in historical fantasy books. I suspect it has something to do with
the imaginative cover art. (Note the little half-yellow book on the right still
handing in there.)
The series continues to be narrated by Tim Gerard, a good,
upstanding Irishman who does a fine job even if he sounds a bit more British
than I would have expected. My friends down at the pub tell me that’s most
likely because Tim is from Dublin—the eastern, Britishified side of the
country. My families (the Sullivans and Flanagans) originally came from the
southwest and northwest of the isle respectively, still I don’t hold that
against him—after all St. James Gate is in Dublin, too.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Objectively Speaking
Are there such things as objectively bad books?
This was a question I was recently asked. Why anyone would
think I am an authority on this subject I don’t know. Perhaps they didn’t, and
were just goading me into an argument. I suspect it is the latter as the person
who asked held some fairly definitive opinions on a large range of books
insisting they are objectively bad. The list included:
·
Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight saga
·
J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings
·
J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter Series
·
And most anything by Stephen King
I’ve never read Twilight
(I’m hardly the demographic), but the other three authors are some of my
favorites and I say that without any qualifiers or fine print.
I don’t like people attempting to use objectivity (judgment based on observable phenomena and
uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices) to insult or bully others.
Saying you don’t like a book, or movie, or song is fine—everyone is entitled to
an opinion—but saying it is not your
opinion but rather that the artwork is universally and verifiably bad—I have a problem with that. And when the same person stated that the Lord of The Rings was objectively bad
(because it lacked world building, no less) well…it was time for a blog post.
Two people look at a rock. Is it bigger than my fist? Harder?
These are objective values—conclusions that can be verified separately by
anyone and return the same answer.
Do you like the rock?
This is a subjective value and is totally opinion based and non-verifiable by
anyone other than the person holding the opinion, and at the time the opinion
is given, for sometimes opinions can change.
Non-fiction can be
objectively bad if the information contained in the book is wrong, as the information
can be objectively verified (granted there is still some interpretation
involved.) But novels are a form of art, and all art is subjective.
Don’t believe me? Go
to any museum I’ll bet you’ll see stuff you like and stuff you don’t like
hanging on the walls. If art was
objective then we could all tell the difference between the good art and the
crap, just as we could tell if a rock was bigger than our fists. So how do we
get this notion that there is good and bad art?
If enough people’s opinions agree on a piece of art—either
by personal preference or political persuasion (in other words, propaganda:
“you’re stupid if you don’t appreciate this” or consequently: “you’re crazy if
you like that!”)—then art is elevated and considered good, but this is still
opinion as verification of an objective value cannot be based on mass appeal
(unless the topic is mass appeal itself.)
So if the majority of people dislike a book then it is likely a bad book, but again this is
still mere opinion and history has shown that often great works are ahead of
their time and not immediately accepted. Vincent Van Gogh, for example, was
considered a joke in his day, and Vivaldi’s Four
Seasons was ignored for two-and-a-half centuries. This shift of value over
time is further evidence that the value of art is subjective, even when originally endorsed by
large numbers of people. Consider the nineteenth century novel The Lamplighter by Maria Cummins—hugely
popular in its day—but now mostly forgotten; and Johann Nepomuk Hummel
considered as good as Mozart in 1820, but who believes that now?
Consider for yourself if there is anything you like now that
you didn’t like before, or vice versa? Did the subject change or just your
perception of it?
Given this, I don’t think you can intelligently state that a
novel that sells millions is objectively bad, when the value of books/art is
wholly opinion based, and there are huge numbers of people on this planet who
love those stories. To me, the fact that these books have garnered such a
following is an indication that they resonate with people and self-evident that
the books are considered good, even though your opinion may differ.
You can’t even argue that the popularity was just hype; that
people bought the novels just to see what all the hubbub was about. In each
case the examples cited had sequels or other works all of which are widely
read. If they were objectively bad, who would bother reading the second much
less the third and fourth and then go see the movies?
I strongly suspect that the concept of objectivity is often
misused by people who merely wish to impose their views on others by insisting
their opinions are more legitimate than others. A favorite tactic is to suggest
research will prove their point, and then offer up still more opinions. This is often the position of bullies who
rather than engage in an honest debate of opinion with an open mind, seeking as
much to be enlightened as to enlighten, prefer to declare they are always
right.
Of course…this is only my opinion.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Committing Murder
My books have often been labeled as an alternative to the
“dark and gritty” trend in fantasy. I accepted this label for two reasons, I’m
not an expert on the recent trends in fantasy (but I’m getting better), and I’d
prefer to think my works are generally pleasant and uplifting. However, not too
long ago, a fan pointed out that for my books being all sunshine and
fairy-tales, I kill a lot of my characters. At first I scoffed. Then I counted.
He was right. Roughly half my cast of good characters don’t reach the end of
the series. That’s a lot of death.
In a comment here, Christina recently asked, ‘I 'd
like to know how you handle cutting characters- particularly ones you might
really like, but just don't fit with the story or bulk it up unnecessarily.
What's the line? Is there something you can point to that tells you 'this one
needs to go?'
There’s no line, and I’m pleased to say I’ve never killed
any character because I thought there were too many in the story, or because
they didn’t have a place anymore. On the other hand I keep my cast of
characters small. I don’t like to randomly add new players if an old one can
play the part. Such a practice saves me the effort of inventing someone new, the
reader from having to learn and keep track of someone new, and—if it reaches the
silver screen—will be appreciated by the actors playing those roles. (That last one is meant to be funny.)
I can also say that every character I’ve killed had to die, usually for more than one reason.
There is the effect of the death itself. Often this is needed merely to ground
the reader into believing that the world they are reading about isn’t all roses
and good-hair-days. Credibility dictates
that bad guys can’t be the only ones to ever really die. While I’m not trying
to write realistic fiction, there is a plausibility factor that has to be
recognized. Who makes this scale? Who decides what is acceptable and what
isn’t? As far as the writing of the book is concerned that person is me. As far
as reading it, that person is you. I tend to use my own instincts. If I like
it, I do it and just hope I’m not too far outside of the mainstream.
The same thing applies to language. My characters speak
modern American English with British slang because I feel that makes reading the books so much
easier and thereby immersive, emotional and more fun (at least for those
accustomed to American English.) Still there are limits. Royce and Hadrian
don’t use the words “cool” or “dude,” or any words that are clearly Earth
related such as eating off fine China. But where is the line? For example I’ve
used the word “mesmerized,” and I’m hoping the majority of you don’t know why
that might be a problem. The word comes from Franz Mesmer a turn of the
nineteenth century physician who pioneered hypnosis. Given that I don’t feel
this is too commonly known, and that the word has become so ingrained in common
use, I made the decision to use it. The litmus test being, “would I find it
jarring to encounter such a word in another fantasy book?” The same is true for
“sun” and “moon.” Going to the effort of inventing new words just seemed
pretentious, anal, and silly, and would be an added level of education forced
on my readers. (Oh I get it that word means moon.)
So when there is a battle and the good guys are outnumbered
two to one, it just strikes me as implausible if, unless there is a some
extenuating circumstance, at least one of the good guys doesn’t die. A few
should be wounded too. In some ways I see this as offsetting, perhaps even
paying the karma price for a heroic victory. Imagine how more believable the Lord
of the Rings might have been if Sam had been the only member of the fellowship
to survive the ordeal. This Pyrrhic
victory would have truly driven home the idea of how desperate that
challenge was. I’m not saying it would have been better…just more believable given the odds.
Killing characters can then be a means of establishing the
seriousness of the problem. Slaying dragons, melting witches, and banishing
demons is all fun and games until someone loses a sidekick—then it’s personal. The
bad guy isn’t just the “bad guy” anymore, he’s the BAD GUY!
Killing a good character can also punch a hole in your
readers chest and strangle their heart. Two things I always aspire to do in my
books is to make my readers laugh and cry, and hopefully within just a few
pages of each other. That’s really the whole reason I write books. Coming up
with a really interesting, or fascinating story that makes your readers go,
“humm,” is nice. Making a thirty-five year old, construction-working,
Budweiser-drinking, never-used-a-band-aid-in-their-life, man cry like a baby
while reading your book in public to the point that they write you to admit
this…that’s priceless.
Mostly, however, the deaths are plot related. This person
has to die so that person can advance. Mentors usually buy it in every fantasy
story. Merlin, Obi Wan, someone in the Potter books (has anyone not read all of
them or seen the movies that I could be spoiling the story for?) Even Gandalf
took one for the team so Frodo could branch off on his own and up the suspense
by finding himself. And I suspect that if you look at any of the deaths in my
series you’ll discover the reasons behind them, be they political, emotional,
karmic, or just the jettisoning of a booster rocket allowing another character
to soar higher.
Bottom line: I never kill for effect, or indiscriminately—I
use every part of the death. Each demise is carefully thought out, and it’s
rippled effects explored, and most characters—those whose deaths are pivotal to
the plot—were created for the specific purpose of dying at just the right
moment to send the plot spinning in a new direction.
I hope that answers your question Christina. If anyone else
has questions out there…I’m always looking for topic ideas.
Thanks for posting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








